Archive for the ‘Prohibition’ category

Why We Fight

January 31st, 2012

On our Busted Intake Form, we collect stories from victims of marijuana prohibition in Montana. Here are some excerpts from a story we received today, from a young woman attending college in Montana.

I was in my dorm on campus…, when I got loud banging on my door at midnight, by police officers. Supposedly a RA smelled pot coming from our room and called them.
 
Once I answered the door, the officers asked what I had been doing that night, I told them I was studying. After that one of the two officers said he could smell marijuana, and knew I had been smoking it. I told them no multiple times, but they kept saying “we know you are lying.”
 
Eventually I confessed I had smoked around 7 that night in my room. I thought that by being honest I would get in less trouble. I was wrong. They also asked if I had any weed in the room, and I decided to tell them yes and showed them where I kept it. They treated me like a criminal, and I felt like my rights had been violated….
 
I got a 250 dollar fine, probation for a year, where if caught with anything illegal, or drinking again, I will go to jail.I was also ordered to go to Self Over Substance classes with a fee of 65 dollars.
 
I find it ridiculous that for smoking a little pot, I could potentially go to jail. I’m an A’s and B’s student in college and I have never had any other problems with the law. I know that as a member of society I would not belong in a jail cell, and what a waste it would be. The whole experience of being busted felt like a complete invasion of privacy, and I soon later learned, had I just not open my door, they would have not been allowed to come in, and I would have avoided all the fines and what not.

 

This sort of thing happens every day, and will continue to happen every day, until like-minded citizens gather the political courage and momentum to change the unjust laws.

As Jack Herer used to say (roughly), until every cannabis consumer spends $20 or 20 minutes on pushing for change, we don’t stand a chance. There are around 100,000 of us in Montana, can you imagine what we could accomplish if we tried?

So, today, tell a friend, spread the word, register to vote, tell your friends to register, donate to and volunteer for Montana First or Montana NORML.

Or stories like the one above will repeat forever.

CI-110 Will End Marijuana Prohibition in Montana

December 31st, 2011

CI-110 was approved for signature gathering this week, and the campaign to place the measure on the 2012 ballot will begin in January. A ballot issue committee has been formed, Montana First, to coordinate the campaign. This is an important effort that deserves attention and support.

A review of the status quo:

Selling (or giving away) any amount of marijuana in Montana could result in a sentence of life in prison (MCA 45-9-101).  By the letter of the law (MCA 45-9-102), a one-gram bust can earn you six months in the county jail, or up to a year for a second offense. Possession of three ounces can land you in state prison for up to five years.  In Missoula County alone, a bust for a small amount of marijuana occurs just about every day.

The Montana experience of medical marijuana over the past two years has been tumultuous and controversial. Traveling mass clinics and what seemed to some to be a “pot shop” on every other corner led to public outcry and skepticism. The legislature responded by repealing medical marijuana and replacing it with an onerous new program. Thousands of people and many businesses have since dropped out of the program and presumably returned to the black market.

Meanwhile,  the prohibition machine, with its taxpayer-funded drug task forces, confidential informants, asset forfeiture seizures, drug testing and treatment industries, private prisons, unregulated black market production and distribution networks, and the arrests of thousands of Montanans with a few grams of cannabis in their pocket,  has continued its expensive, destructive, and ineffective work.

 

The Solution: CI-110

CI-110 is a constitutional initiative. In other words, it’s a proposal submitted to the citizens of Montana which, if it passes, will change the Montana constitution.

CI-110 would alter Article II, Section 14, titled “Adult Rights”, which currently reads:

Section 14. Adult rights. A person 18 years of age or older is an adult for all purposes, except that the legislature or the people by initiative may establish the legal age for purchasing, consuming, or possessing alcoholic beverages.

If CI-110 passes, this section would be changed as follows (new text underlined):

Section 14. Adult rights. A person 18 years of age or older is an adult for all purposes, except that the legislature or the people by initiative may establish the legal age for purchasing, consuming, or possessing alcoholic beverages, and marijuana. Adults have the right to responsibly purchase, consume, produce, and possess marijuana, subject to reasonable limitations, regulations, and taxation. Except for actions that endanger minors, children, or public safety, no criminal offense or penalty of this state shall apply to such activities.

The changes would become effective on July 1st, 2013.

The 2013 legislature would be unable to amend or repeal the change. However,  with a two-thirds vote, they could refer the amendment back to the people to vote again in 2014.

The legislature (many of whom we’ll have the opportunity to elect in 2012) may choose to develop new laws which implement the “reasonable limitations, regulations, and taxation”. They may also choose to repeal the current prohibition laws. Or they may do nothing (whether due to inaction or gridlock).

The federal government may pressure state leaders to not create any sort of regulatory infrastructure. If our legislators bow to that pressure, there will be no defined limits or rules aside from what’s implied in the measure itself.

On the other hand, the legislature may craft a regulatory system for legal marijuana, possibly including personal possession and plant limits (or garden sizes, a more reasonable measure of production capacity), licensing, taxes, and so forth. What they come up with is anyone’s guess, but we’ll all have a chance to assist in the process, if we get involved. This makes it especially important to elect legislators who are willing to work with us.

If the marijuana prohibition laws stay on the books, then it’s possible that state law enforcement officials may still conduct marijuana arrests, despite CI-110. If that happens, it’s possible that judges will throw marijuana cases out at first appearance, and the law enforcement agencies may face liability for wrongful arrest and/or due process.

Medical marijuana will still be on the books (either some form of SB 423, or I-148, if the people so choose). However, any adult will have a constitutional right to grow their own cannabis garden, and/or buy cannabis from another adult.

None of this protects Montanans from federal law enforcement agents. However, ending state prohibition of marijuana sends a powerful message to federal authorities that Montanans will no longer participate in their war on people who choose cannabis. This is an important step in the process.

 

How You Can Help

To put CI-110 on the ballot, signatures must be obtained from 10 percent of the total number of qualified voters in Montana, including 10 percent of the voters in each of 40 legislative house districts (a total of 48,674 valid signatures for the 2012 ballot). They must be collected, submitted, and validated prior to June 22nd, 2012.

That’s a lot of signatures, twice as many as the recent referendum campaign needed. This will require an army of volunteers and professional management.  In the fall, there will need to be a voter education campaign in the media to defuse criticisms and get out the vote.  This campaign will require substantial donations of time and money to succeed.

Montana NORML has committed $1000 to help Montana First kick things off, and will continue to offer financial help as we’re able.

Whether an adult uses marijuana as serious medicine,  herbal preventative, social relaxant, or spiritual sacrament, such use should be of no concern to government authorities, absent harm to others. CI-110 will enshrine that principle as a constitutional right, and end marijuana prohibition in Montana.

A Cynical Shift in Prohibitionist Rhetoric

July 18th, 2011

In the beginning (of the 2011 legislative session), prohibitionist rhetoric concerning medical marijuana was alarming, even hysterical, completely over the top. A few examples:

Senator Essman, speaking in support of the repeal bill: “The greater good here is not losing a generation of young people, and that is why I am voting yes on this repeal bill.”

Representative Milburn, speaking in support of repeal: “This is rampant, it’s permeating through our society, it’s into our schools and families, it’s individual degradation, it’s causing huge problems…the tragic events taking place in Montana, changing society, changing culture.”

And of course, the instant classic from Representative Howard: “It’s poison, a kind of poison. It’s kind of like taking arsenic with Valium®, you’re going to feel good until it kills you…. it is affecting our schools and work, every facet of our life in Montana, and it is slowly but surely dragging us down. It is a drug induced society…. it’s a scourge.”

As a parenthetical aside, what exactly is a scourge?

scourge  (skûrj)
n.
1. A source of widespread dreadful affliction and devastation such as that caused by pestilence or war.
2. A means of inflicting severe suffering, vengeance, or punishment.

Recently, the rhetoric of our opposition has shifted away from the scourge, to focus on the state/federal conflict in marijuana law.

Senator Shockley claimed last week: “The Legislature realized the tough situation that federal law enforcement was put in by the current law, and the risk to Montana citizens who wished to benefit from medical marijuana, either as a grower or a medical user. The Legislature was attempting to limit production in a way that would not attract federal attention.”

Essman, too: “The Legislature was grappling with trying to conform the law to a series of letters from U.S. attorneys that indicated a commercial business model would still be prosecuted…So that’s why we voted for that approach.”

With a slippery sidestep, now they’re saying they were just trying to protect us from federal law enforcement. Their absurd hyperbole didn’t work, so they’ve shifted gears to try and get us to believe that they were trying to protect…. brace yourself… people who grow marijuana. Does anyone else find that hard to believe?
Most Montanans recognized the earlier prohibitionist statements as ridiculous lies.

Most Montanans acknowledge that marijuana has been around a long time, lots of people have tried it, some people like it, and some people derive real therapeutic benefits from it.

We don’t have to lie. We have truth, liberty, and justice on our side, so we can simply continue telling the truth.

This Federal Bullshit Has Got To Stop

July 6th, 2011

Dear President Obama,

You have better things to do.

Here we go again. Montana marijuana farmers facing 40 years in federal prison. Here’s some more. And there are more, all over.

The famed “Holder memo“, expertly crafted to  raise hopes and then destroy lives, has now been clarified, to ensure everyone understands that the United States federal government will attack anyone who tries to run a responsible and ethical business that involves farming and selling cannabis. They say it’s a bad use of “resources” to go after patients dying of cancer and AIDS (who could disagree?), but anyone who grows and sells risks the full and violent force of the DEA, IRS, FBI, etc.

Meanwhile, 58% of voters in the West believe marijuana should be legal for grown-ups, Montanans consume 30,000 pounds a year, and are generally eager to be taxed for the privilege of “getting legal” and diverting their financial support of the criminal black market to legitimate local businesses.

If I was king for a day? First, I’d direct the feds (with their 104,000 cops in 80 agencies) to focus our tax dollars on some other categories of crime:

That’s a short list I came up with in 15 minutes. There are proper, useful, just roles for federal law enforcement. I want my tax dollars to fight these crimes.

Arresting and incarcerating cannabis farmers providing an agricultural commodity to responsible adults doesn’t make the list. So, stop, please.

Agree? The audience for our objections includes several elected officials. Please give them a (polite) piece of your mind, and ask them to stand up for Montanans who have participated responsibly in the Montana medical marijuana marketplace. Ask Denny Rehberg (our federal Representative, call (202) 225-3211 right now) to support  HR 2306, which would end federal marijuana prohibition.

Ask Baucus and Tester (call both right now), our Montana Senators, to pressure the Department of Justice and the Obama administration to leave Montana alone when it comes to marijuana. We’re Montanans, we’ll figure it out, please give us the freedom to do so without your federal guns blazing.

And tell the Obama administration: After your statements during the campaign, Montanans are deeply disappointed in your hypocrisy. Stop it.

The federal/state conflict question is an important one, and now that our neighbors continue to be rounded up and threatened with being carted off to federal prison, now’s the time for you to speak up. Please take action, now.

Independence and Unity in Cannabis Politics

July 4th, 2011

“Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice.”

- Thomas Paine

All our activism is undergirded by principles, a “constitution” of moral values that inspires us to action, and identifying those can help clarify strategy and tactics in the battle to end cannabis prohibition. For NORML, the end goal is legalization.

A recent essay by a cannabis publishing entrepreneur in Montana alleges the legalization movement will “sink” medical marijuana. (The essay then argues that the author’s advertising-supported trade magazine is superior to its competitors. It may be, and I don’t intend to critique that portion of the essay here.)

But right at the outset, the essay makes a specific attack on what the author refers to as the “Culture Club”. Perhaps this is an admonition to never admit that marijuana can be enjoyable, enhance experiences of art and philosophy and sex, and has a tangible influence on music and culture. Or perhaps it’s a specific criticism of a competitor’s publication which bills itself as a “cannabis lifestyle magazine”. Or maybe it’s intended to chastise anyone who uses advocacy rhetoric inconsistent with the tired (but true) “precious medicine for the sick and dying” theme.

Regardless, it’s a divisive approach, and more damaging than advocating for systems other than medical-use only (which, in my view, is a flawed policy).

Today is Independence Day, and while for some it means flag waving and parades and burgers and fireworks, I prefer to recognize the patriotism inherent in our work in cannabis politics. Consider these words, which should sound familiar to Americans:

…all men are created equal, that they are endowed… with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness…. Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it

Cannabis prohibition is destructive to liberty and happiness, that’s for sure. And we’re all working hard to alter or abolish it.

Cannabis activists are by their very nature an eclectic, iconoclastic bunch of “outlaws”, with a passion for action and a healthy distrust of authority. We’re “independent-minded”, to be sure. So we’re going to come at this battle from different angles. We’ll all have an opinion about the perfect strategy.

What unites us is a fundamental principle:  that the government is lying about  this plant, and it’s wrong to put people in jail for it.

What flows from that principle is a policy proposal: end cannabis prohibition, and create a legal system for all responsible adults to have safe access if they want to.

In the West, the public will support such a proposal if it’s framed well.

As for me — I wrote a few months back about the reasons for medical marijuana patients to support policies expanding legal access to all responsible adults, and I sincerely hope that patients will take those words to heart. After all, legalization will be the best thing for patients.

I welcome your thoughtful critique.

 

SB 423 Will Not Take The Money Out Of The Industry

May 13th, 2011

Various Montana legislators, especially the Republicans, have stated over and over that one “benefit” of SB 423 is that it will “take the money out of the industry”, or, “take the profit out of it”.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

By eliminate legal commerce in cannabis between caregivers and registered cardholders, the Republicans have simply succeeded in providing a boost to the black market, and all that that entails.

And, because the risk of operating on a black market rather than within a legal system increases the price of any product, what they likely have done is add profits to the illegal industry. That’s why folks are calling it the “black market bill”.

There’s a childlike naivete to the Republicans’ statement that by making marijuana cost-free to patients, nothing of value will be exchanged for this valuable commodity. Kind of like covering your eyes and believing that the whole world has disappeared.

Hopefully, the efforts of the Montana Cannabis Industry Association will prevent this ridiculous bill, which tramples the will of voters, from becoming law.

 

 

Questions For The Local Law Enforcement Agencies That Helped With The Federal Raids

March 29th, 2011

In March 2011, the United States federal government launched raids on numerous medical marijuana providers throughout Montana. We liveblogged the events as they transpired.

Later, the U.S. Attorney released a statement about the raids, praising the 20+ state and local agencies that helped out.

When I saw that long list of participating agencies who aided federal authorities in the enforcement in federal law, I got curious about what exactly their roles were, what they knew, when they knew it, and whether they’d get a share of the seized and forfeited assets. Read more about asset forfeiture here.

Happily, because Montana has right to know guaranteed in our constitution, and we have strong open records laws in 44-5-301 and 2-6-102 (and the sections that follow them), it’s a simple matter to write and ask to see what they’ve got. They can deny me some information, like if the information would jeopardize an ongoing investigation, or violate a person’s privacy. But pretty much everything else is fair game, and they’re legally required to answer.

So today, I wrote letters to most of the participating agencies, and a few other state government entities who were probably “in the loop”, and asked the following questions:

  1. Please provide a narrative of how and when you became aware of the federal government’s investigations into medical marijuana in Montana. Please include specific dates and names of all federal agencies with whom your agency communicated about the investigations.
  2. Was your agency requested to help in the investigations in any way? If so, how, and by whom?
  3. Was your agency’s help requested in determining whether the activities under investigation were illegal under state law? If so, how, and by whom?
  4. Is there a written or understood policy that your agency follows with regards to determining whether a federal warrant is lawful under Montana law?
  5. Please describe your agency’s constitutional obligation to ensure that the federal warrants were lawful under state law and executed lawfully.
  6. Please provide a narrative of how and when you became aware of the federal government’s intentions to execute warrants and raid medical marijuana businesses in Montana.  Please include specific dates and names of all federal agencies with whom your agency communicated about the raids.
  7. Please provide copies of any and all contracts, agreements, memoranda, letters, and emails relevant to your agency’s involvement in these federal raids.
  8. How many total staff hours were required to coordinate and execute your agency’s assistance to federal authorities on these raids? Please provide best estimates if staff time was not tracked.
  9. How many of those hours were overtime?
  10. What is the average wage of individuals employed or contracted by your agency who helped to coordinate, assist, or participate in the federal raids?
  11. Please describe in detail and provide copies of supporting documentation (contracts, memoranda, emails, etc), if any, of assurances, expressed or implied, that you received related to your agency being a recipient of a portion of assets subject to forfeiture in the federal raids.
  12. What specific roles was your agency assigned or expected to perform in the investigation of these cases, and execution of these warrants?
  13. Did your agency receive federal raid-related information from, or provide such information to, the Montana All Threat Information Center? If so, what was the nature of the information transmitted?
  14. In State v. Nelson, the Montana Supreme Court noted that under certain circumstances, state entities may not use violations of federal law as a justification for establishing state penalties. Upon which law or rule did your agency rely in considering participation in these federal raids?
  15. Did your agency suspect violations of state law with regards to the targets of the federal raids? If so, why did your agency not act on its own, or in coordination with other state entities?

I’ve requested the information by April 16th, and will publish our findings in future posts.

Will Montana’s Medical Cannabis Patients Support Legalization in 2012?

March 28th, 2011

A version of this article appeared in Kush magazine.

In Montana, there are around 100,000 adult cannabis consumers. Some of them suffer qualifying medical conditions and use cannabis as a natural treatment for their debilitating symptoms. Some use it for non-qualifying conditions, such as insomnia, depression, anxiety, cramps, PTSD.

And then there are people for whom cannabis is a non-medical life enhancer: to increase their enjoyment of food, sex, poetry and cinema, or inspire their art and writing, gardening and programming, or enrich their social interactions, or simply relax after a hard day’s work.

There’s no reason that these two groups need to clash, and in fact, they often overlap. The card-carrying Crohn’s disease patient who derives both symptomatic relief and enjoyment from sharing a fat joint of Super Silver Haze with his buddies before kicking back on the couch to watch Pineapple Express (for the third time) is in both camps.

While cannabis can be a “precious medicine for the sick and dying”, that’s not all it is, and we run a real risk of painting ourselves into a corner and setting up needless conflicts within the cannabis community by insisting that it’s only for one group and not the other.

Legalization would be better for patients than the expensive and bureaucratic system we have now: No “qualifying conditions”, no annual doctor certification requirements, higher product quality, lower prices.

So why would patients not support legalization if given the chance?

Selfish ambivalence, for one. After all, the thinking goes, once “I got mine”, who cares about the rest of you “undeserving” non-patients, right?

Not exactly an enlightened position. Don’t forget that there were an awful lot of non-patients who supported medical marijuana back in 2004. How about returning the favor?

Another objection to legalization you may hear from the only-medical camp concerns taxation. They demand an exemption from taxation, because they say their cannabis is medicine, and no other medicine is taxed.

It’s a nice thought, but there are many reasons cannabis should be taxed.

  • First, taxes are not inherently evil. Taxes ensure we have roads to drive on, that someone comes when we call 911, that we have a civil society in general. What’s taxed and to what degree is worth debating, but it’s absurd to start from a position that all taxes are automatically bad.
  • Second, plugging cannabis tax policy into the law books makes all us responsible adult cannabis consumers in Montana part of a legitimate civil/political structure. It brings us out of the shadows, into the light.
  • Third, while you and I may be passionate about pot policy, a whole lot of people don’t care much. Offering a new revenue source for critical public services can create new allies, and solve real funding problems. In fact, most cannabis consumers would agree that we’re the one consumer group likely to say “please, tax us!”

A final reason that some in the medical marijuana industry may oppose legalization: naked greed.

Medical marijuana is a partial market for cannabis consumers, and hence leaves a substantial portion of the black market intact. By preserving a black market for cannabis, prices (and profits, if your production is efficient) remain high for sellers.

There is no reason that this dried plant material needs to sell for $250 or more per ounce. The drastically more labor-intensive herb saffron sells for less. For perspective, a full football field of saffron flowers produces a mere one pound of the dried herb. A guy could could grow a pound of cured cannabis flowers in a spare bedroom or a corner of his back yard.

Whether the “I got mine” crowd, the naive anti-tax folks, or the greedy business types will be able to sink legalization in 2012 is yet to be seen. Of course the moralistic anti-freedom crusaders will make a vigorous showing as well, so we’ve really got our work cut out for us.

As the day approaches, cannabis consumers statewide should keep talking with one another about the details of legalization, acknowledging that compromise and some sort of tax or fee will probably be a necessary part of any proposal with a chance of passage. But how exactly should it work? What’s got the best chance of winning? Hopefully, we’ll all be able to see that liberating this plant, even via imperfect legislation, is just the right thing to do, and far preferable to the failed, expensive, and destructive policy of prohibition.

Montana Medical Marijuana Federal Raid Protests

March 15th, 2011

The federal raid live blog continues here.

Statewide protests against the dramatic and callous raids on as many as a dozen medical marijuana providers, timed perfectly to “coincide” with a key Senate vote on repealing medical marijuana, commence tomorrow, Wednesday, March 16th, 2011.

In cities statewide, Americans for Safe Access and Montana NORML (among others) are calling for people to convene upon their local city halls at 5PM, in protest of these federal actions and in solidarity with the thousands of affected patients.

What:  Vigils at Local City Halls
When: Tomorrow, Wednesday March 16th, 2011 starting at 5PM
Where: Your Local City Hall
IMPORTANT: Bring signs that say:  YOUR CITY wants Feds Out of MT” (for example , “Billings wants Feds out of Montana!”)

Some local events have Facebook pages:

If you plan to attend your local event, and to get information about joining a 2PM coordination conference call prior to the vigil,  please send an email with your city’s name in the subject line to: action@safeaccessnow.org

 

Also, in Missoula, an “Out of the Shadows, into the Streets!” march is planned for Saturday the 19th in Missoula. Convene at Caras Park at noon. Bring your signs from Wednesday! Here is the Facebook event page.

If you plan to attend an event please send an email with your cities name in the subject line to action@safeaccessnow.org

Federal Raids in Montana: What to do TODAY

March 15th, 2011

The federal raid live blog continues here.

A lot of people are angry and asking us what they can do.

For today (Tuesday March 15th, 2011), our advice is to take our complaints to our congressional delegation and newspapers.

The core message: You’re upset about the unconscionable federal intrusion that appears timed to meddle with Montana state politics and will harm countless patients.

Write a letter to the editor of your local paper. You can usually find an email address on their ‘Contact’ page; here are a few:
- http://missoulian.com/app/contact/
- http://billingsgazette.com/app/contact/?contact=letter
- http://www.greatfallstribune.com/section/customerservice03
- http://helenair.com/app/contact/
- http://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/submissions/?mode=letters
- http://www.dailyinterlake.com/contact_us/

Call the closest office of John Tester, Denny Rehberg, and Max Baucus who work for us in Washington DC:

http://rehberg.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=31&sectiontree=6,31

http://tester.senate.gov/Contact/offices.cfm

http://baucus.senate.gov/?p=contact

Call them before noon Tuesday if you can. Concentrating the calls in a single morning will have an impact.

The core message: You’re upset about the unconscionable federal intrusion that appears timed to meddle with Montana state politics and will harm countless patients.

If their representatives tell you anything interesting, please let us know what you’ve learned.