Fee Increase, Updates and Rule Changes at DPHHS

April 27th, 2012 by John Masterson 9 comments »

Several changes appeared yesterday at the DPHHS marijuana website. A summary:

  • Patient registration fee increase from $25 to $75, effective June 1st, 2012
  • Patient renewal fee increase from $10 to $75, effective June 1st, 2012
  • Regardless of when a registration/renewal is postmarked, if DPHHS receives it on or after June 1st, 2012, the new fee applies
  • Incorrect fees will cause the application to be denied
  • Providers application fees are $50
  • Providers must re-apply annually
  • Fees are never refunded, even if the application is incomplete or denied, or the card is later revoked
  • All applications require a photocopy of a valid (not expired) Montana driver’s license or state issued ID, to prove Montana residency.  The photocopy must be legible.
  • Landlord permission forms must be notarized

Reasons for the changes are contained in this Administrative Rules document (PDF).

There are now 11,993 registered patients in Montana, a drop of more than 2,300 in the last month. The program has shed roughly 18,000 participants in the last year.

 

 

 

Newsletter: Strength in Numbers

April 26th, 2012 by John Masterson No comments »

To join the free Montana NORML newsletter e-list, click here.

Friends,

We’re hearing some outrageous, heartbreaking, and discouraging news these days. More federal raids. Indictments, convictions, prison sentences and heavy fines (see news stories below). Montana citizens, whose mistake was to believe that careful compliance with state law would protect them from federal law enforcement, are now facing decades in prison.

It’s enough to make an advocate conclude, “the feds have won, we give up.”

I’ve even heard that some people are afraid to sign the petition for CI-110, because they “don’t want to be on a list”.

I get it. After all, just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they’re not out to get you. And they’re out to get us, every single one of us.

But there’s strength in numbers, and I’ll tell you, we’ve got the numbers. Around 100,000 people in Montana consume cannabis from time to time. Enough to change any election. Enough to put CI-110 on the ballot.  Enough to win.

But we — you and I — can’t wait for “someone else” to do it.

If everyone reading this collected ten signatures from family and friends, we’d qualify CI-110 for the ballot in no time.

Ready to get started? Great! Email volunteer@montanafirst2012.org or call (406) 359-1888, today. Time is short, please get involved right away.

Not convinced? The CI-110 effort is also hiring signature gatherers and regional leaders. Call or email to learn more, or just hit reply and I’ll help.

Before I get to news and events, a quick administrative note. I’m pleased to announce that longtime Montana NORML volunteer Justin Michels has agree to take on the volunteer role of Deputy Director — my right-hand-man.  Thank you, Justin, and congrats!

Montana Marijuana News & Events

Events:


News
:

Finally:

 

Be a part of history, come help us celebrate the end of prohibition!

April 26th, 2012 by justin No comments »

INTERNATIONAL DAY OF ACTION FOR ACTIVISTS: SATURDAY MAY 5 2012

FOURTEENTH ANNUAL GLOBAL CANNABIS MARCH

As they have in years past, local Activists from Missoula will join over three hundred cities worldwide in the fourteenth annual Global Cannabis March. Participants are especially excited for this year’s march because of the momentum building behind their long-held position that marijuana prohibition causes more harm than actual marijuana. 2012 will be a landmark year for marijuana reform activists around the nation. Colorado and Washington state have so far qualified initiatives to legalize and regulate marijuana similar to alcohol.

Montana NORML is coordinating the event to capture support for Montana First, a campaign that is working currently to put a ballot proposal on the November ballot that will protect the rights of adults who use and grow marijuana.

The march is scheduled to begin shortly after 4pm on Saturday May 5th.

Local participants will gather at Jacob’s Island (Bark Park) to march along the Clark Fork River to the Missoula County courthouse and through the downtown streets. The march is scheduled to begin shortly after 4pm. (Facebook event here.)

Members of the public are welcome to attend. Signature gatherers will be present throughout the event.

Speakers include:

Craig Shannon, a local criminal defense attorney.

Emmett Reistroffer, Statewide petition coordinator for CI-110.

A Long, Painful, Expensive Process

April 4th, 2012 by John Masterson No comments »

Some people say that working to change state marijuana laws is pointless, because federal law trumps state law, and the feds will send armed agents to disrupt whatever states may attempt.

While it’s important to be conscious of federal powers, changing state policies is nevertheless an important step in the process.

Here is how things change:

One person, just like you, gets fed up. They volunteer, or write a check to a local organization working to end marijuana prohibition.

Meanwhile, federal law remains the same, and federal representatives turn a blind eye, replying to constituent pleas with terse form letters.

Eventually, enough people join the cause with their time and dollars, and the local organization becomes more effective, and works to educate voters about the merits of the cause.

Meanwhile, federal law remains the same, and federal representatives turn a blind eye.

The organization (or network of affiliated organizations) grows, and state-level policies change for the better, whether by initiative or statute. There is some ebb and flow, some big tragedies and small victories.

Meanwhile, federal law remains the same, and federal representatives turn a blind eye.

But public opinion has shifted now, and some mainstream state leaders feel comfortable speaking out.

And, 55% of voters in Western states now believe marijuana should be legal.

But federal law remains the same, and with a few exceptions, federal representatives turn a blind eye.

And then, in line with evolving popular opinion, advocates are successful in toppling prohibition at the state level. Maybe it’s Colorado, or Oregon, or Washington, or even Montana. Or all of the above.

At that point, federal representatives can’t ignore it anymore. Even better, they will have political cover now.  Eventually, some will support the new policy in their home state and introduce or support similar legislation at the  federal level.

And finally, federal prohibition is, will be, repealed.

It’s a long process, it’s a painful process, it’s an expensive process, but for our movement, it’s the only way to get there.

You can help move it forward by making a donation or volunteering to collect signatures for Montana First, the campaign to end marijuana prohibition in Montana. Do it today.

 

 

 

 

Why We Fight

January 31st, 2012 by John Masterson No comments »

On our Busted Intake Form, we collect stories from victims of marijuana prohibition in Montana. Here are some excerpts from a story we received today, from a young woman attending college in Montana.

I was in my dorm on campus…, when I got loud banging on my door at midnight, by police officers. Supposedly a RA smelled pot coming from our room and called them.
 
Once I answered the door, the officers asked what I had been doing that night, I told them I was studying. After that one of the two officers said he could smell marijuana, and knew I had been smoking it. I told them no multiple times, but they kept saying “we know you are lying.”
 
Eventually I confessed I had smoked around 7 that night in my room. I thought that by being honest I would get in less trouble. I was wrong. They also asked if I had any weed in the room, and I decided to tell them yes and showed them where I kept it. They treated me like a criminal, and I felt like my rights had been violated….
 
I got a 250 dollar fine, probation for a year, where if caught with anything illegal, or drinking again, I will go to jail.I was also ordered to go to Self Over Substance classes with a fee of 65 dollars.
 
I find it ridiculous that for smoking a little pot, I could potentially go to jail. I’m an A’s and B’s student in college and I have never had any other problems with the law. I know that as a member of society I would not belong in a jail cell, and what a waste it would be. The whole experience of being busted felt like a complete invasion of privacy, and I soon later learned, had I just not open my door, they would have not been allowed to come in, and I would have avoided all the fines and what not.

 

This sort of thing happens every day, and will continue to happen every day, until like-minded citizens gather the political courage and momentum to change the unjust laws.

As Jack Herer used to say (roughly), until every cannabis consumer spends $20 or 20 minutes on pushing for change, we don’t stand a chance. There are around 100,000 of us in Montana, can you imagine what we could accomplish if we tried?

So, today, tell a friend, spread the word, register to vote, tell your friends to register, donate to and volunteer for Montana First or Montana NORML.

Or stories like the one above will repeat forever.

CI-110 Will End Marijuana Prohibition in Montana

December 31st, 2011 by John Masterson 2 comments »

CI-110 was approved for signature gathering this week, and the campaign to place the measure on the 2012 ballot will begin in January. A ballot issue committee has been formed, Montana First, to coordinate the campaign. This is an important effort that deserves attention and support.

A review of the status quo:

Selling (or giving away) any amount of marijuana in Montana could result in a sentence of life in prison (MCA 45-9-101).  By the letter of the law (MCA 45-9-102), a one-gram bust can earn you six months in the county jail, or up to a year for a second offense. Possession of three ounces can land you in state prison for up to five years.  In Missoula County alone, a bust for a small amount of marijuana occurs just about every day.

The Montana experience of medical marijuana over the past two years has been tumultuous and controversial. Traveling mass clinics and what seemed to some to be a “pot shop” on every other corner led to public outcry and skepticism. The legislature responded by repealing medical marijuana and replacing it with an onerous new program. Thousands of people and many businesses have since dropped out of the program and presumably returned to the black market.

Meanwhile,  the prohibition machine, with its taxpayer-funded drug task forces, confidential informants, asset forfeiture seizures, drug testing and treatment industries, private prisons, unregulated black market production and distribution networks, and the arrests of thousands of Montanans with a few grams of cannabis in their pocket,  has continued its expensive, destructive, and ineffective work.

 

The Solution: CI-110

CI-110 is a constitutional initiative. In other words, it’s a proposal submitted to the citizens of Montana which, if it passes, will change the Montana constitution.

CI-110 would alter Article II, Section 14, titled “Adult Rights”, which currently reads:

Section 14. Adult rights. A person 18 years of age or older is an adult for all purposes, except that the legislature or the people by initiative may establish the legal age for purchasing, consuming, or possessing alcoholic beverages.

If CI-110 passes, this section would be changed as follows (new text underlined):

Section 14. Adult rights. A person 18 years of age or older is an adult for all purposes, except that the legislature or the people by initiative may establish the legal age for purchasing, consuming, or possessing alcoholic beverages, and marijuana. Adults have the right to responsibly purchase, consume, produce, and possess marijuana, subject to reasonable limitations, regulations, and taxation. Except for actions that endanger minors, children, or public safety, no criminal offense or penalty of this state shall apply to such activities.

The changes would become effective on July 1st, 2013.

The 2013 legislature would be unable to amend or repeal the change. However,  with a two-thirds vote, they could refer the amendment back to the people to vote again in 2014.

The legislature (many of whom we’ll have the opportunity to elect in 2012) may choose to develop new laws which implement the “reasonable limitations, regulations, and taxation”. They may also choose to repeal the current prohibition laws. Or they may do nothing (whether due to inaction or gridlock).

The federal government may pressure state leaders to not create any sort of regulatory infrastructure. If our legislators bow to that pressure, there will be no defined limits or rules aside from what’s implied in the measure itself.

On the other hand, the legislature may craft a regulatory system for legal marijuana, possibly including personal possession and plant limits (or garden sizes, a more reasonable measure of production capacity), licensing, taxes, and so forth. What they come up with is anyone’s guess, but we’ll all have a chance to assist in the process, if we get involved. This makes it especially important to elect legislators who are willing to work with us.

If the marijuana prohibition laws stay on the books, then it’s possible that state law enforcement officials may still conduct marijuana arrests, despite CI-110. If that happens, it’s possible that judges will throw marijuana cases out at first appearance, and the law enforcement agencies may face liability for wrongful arrest and/or due process.

Medical marijuana will still be on the books (either some form of SB 423, or I-148, if the people so choose). However, any adult will have a constitutional right to grow their own cannabis garden, and/or buy cannabis from another adult.

None of this protects Montanans from federal law enforcement agents. However, ending state prohibition of marijuana sends a powerful message to federal authorities that Montanans will no longer participate in their war on people who choose cannabis. This is an important step in the process.

 

How You Can Help

To put CI-110 on the ballot, signatures must be obtained from 10 percent of the total number of qualified voters in Montana, including 10 percent of the voters in each of 40 legislative house districts (a total of 48,674 valid signatures for the 2012 ballot). They must be collected, submitted, and validated prior to June 22nd, 2012.

That’s a lot of signatures, twice as many as the recent referendum campaign needed. This will require an army of volunteers and professional management.  In the fall, there will need to be a voter education campaign in the media to defuse criticisms and get out the vote.  This campaign will require substantial donations of time and money to succeed.

Montana NORML has committed $1000 to help Montana First kick things off, and will continue to offer financial help as we’re able.

Whether an adult uses marijuana as serious medicine,  herbal preventative, social relaxant, or spiritual sacrament, such use should be of no concern to government authorities, absent harm to others. CI-110 will enshrine that principle as a constitutional right, and end marijuana prohibition in Montana.

A Cynical Shift in Prohibitionist Rhetoric

July 18th, 2011 by John Masterson 5 comments »

In the beginning (of the 2011 legislative session), prohibitionist rhetoric concerning medical marijuana was alarming, even hysterical, completely over the top. A few examples:

Senator Essman, speaking in support of the repeal bill: “The greater good here is not losing a generation of young people, and that is why I am voting yes on this repeal bill.”

Representative Milburn, speaking in support of repeal: “This is rampant, it’s permeating through our society, it’s into our schools and families, it’s individual degradation, it’s causing huge problems…the tragic events taking place in Montana, changing society, changing culture.”

And of course, the instant classic from Representative Howard: “It’s poison, a kind of poison. It’s kind of like taking arsenic with Valium®, you’re going to feel good until it kills you…. it is affecting our schools and work, every facet of our life in Montana, and it is slowly but surely dragging us down. It is a drug induced society…. it’s a scourge.”

As a parenthetical aside, what exactly is a scourge?

scourge  (skûrj)
n.
1. A source of widespread dreadful affliction and devastation such as that caused by pestilence or war.
2. A means of inflicting severe suffering, vengeance, or punishment.

Recently, the rhetoric of our opposition has shifted away from the scourge, to focus on the state/federal conflict in marijuana law.

Senator Shockley claimed last week: “The Legislature realized the tough situation that federal law enforcement was put in by the current law, and the risk to Montana citizens who wished to benefit from medical marijuana, either as a grower or a medical user. The Legislature was attempting to limit production in a way that would not attract federal attention.”

Essman, too: “The Legislature was grappling with trying to conform the law to a series of letters from U.S. attorneys that indicated a commercial business model would still be prosecuted…So that’s why we voted for that approach.”

With a slippery sidestep, now they’re saying they were just trying to protect us from federal law enforcement. Their absurd hyperbole didn’t work, so they’ve shifted gears to try and get us to believe that they were trying to protect…. brace yourself… people who grow marijuana. Does anyone else find that hard to believe?
Most Montanans recognized the earlier prohibitionist statements as ridiculous lies.

Most Montanans acknowledge that marijuana has been around a long time, lots of people have tried it, some people like it, and some people derive real therapeutic benefits from it.

We don’t have to lie. We have truth, liberty, and justice on our side, so we can simply continue telling the truth.

This Federal Bullshit Has Got To Stop

July 6th, 2011 by John Masterson 13 comments »

Dear President Obama,

You have better things to do.

Here we go again. Montana marijuana farmers facing 40 years in federal prison. Here’s some more. And there are more, all over.

The famed “Holder memo“, expertly crafted to  raise hopes and then destroy lives, has now been clarified, to ensure everyone understands that the United States federal government will attack anyone who tries to run a responsible and ethical business that involves farming and selling cannabis. They say it’s a bad use of “resources” to go after patients dying of cancer and AIDS (who could disagree?), but anyone who grows and sells risks the full and violent force of the DEA, IRS, FBI, etc.

Meanwhile, 58% of voters in the West believe marijuana should be legal for grown-ups, Montanans consume 30,000 pounds a year, and are generally eager to be taxed for the privilege of “getting legal” and diverting their financial support of the criminal black market to legitimate local businesses.

If I was king for a day? First, I’d direct the feds (with their 104,000 cops in 80 agencies) to focus our tax dollars on some other categories of crime:

That’s a short list I came up with in 15 minutes. There are proper, useful, just roles for federal law enforcement. I want my tax dollars to fight these crimes.

Arresting and incarcerating cannabis farmers providing an agricultural commodity to responsible adults doesn’t make the list. So, stop, please.

Agree? The audience for our objections includes several elected officials. Please give them a (polite) piece of your mind, and ask them to stand up for Montanans who have participated responsibly in the Montana medical marijuana marketplace. Ask Denny Rehberg (our federal Representative, call (202) 225-3211 right now) to support  HR 2306, which would end federal marijuana prohibition.

Ask Baucus and Tester (call both right now), our Montana Senators, to pressure the Department of Justice and the Obama administration to leave Montana alone when it comes to marijuana. We’re Montanans, we’ll figure it out, please give us the freedom to do so without your federal guns blazing.

And tell the Obama administration: After your statements during the campaign, Montanans are deeply disappointed in your hypocrisy. Stop it.

The federal/state conflict question is an important one, and now that our neighbors continue to be rounded up and threatened with being carted off to federal prison, now’s the time for you to speak up. Please take action, now.

Independence and Unity in Cannabis Politics

July 4th, 2011 by John Masterson 4 comments »

“Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice.”

- Thomas Paine

All our activism is undergirded by principles, a “constitution” of moral values that inspires us to action, and identifying those can help clarify strategy and tactics in the battle to end cannabis prohibition. For NORML, the end goal is legalization.

A recent essay by a cannabis publishing entrepreneur in Montana alleges the legalization movement will “sink” medical marijuana. (The essay then argues that the author’s advertising-supported trade magazine is superior to its competitors. It may be, and I don’t intend to critique that portion of the essay here.)

But right at the outset, the essay makes a specific attack on what the author refers to as the “Culture Club”. Perhaps this is an admonition to never admit that marijuana can be enjoyable, enhance experiences of art and philosophy and sex, and has a tangible influence on music and culture. Or perhaps it’s a specific criticism of a competitor’s publication which bills itself as a “cannabis lifestyle magazine”. Or maybe it’s intended to chastise anyone who uses advocacy rhetoric inconsistent with the tired (but true) “precious medicine for the sick and dying” theme.

Regardless, it’s a divisive approach, and more damaging than advocating for systems other than medical-use only (which, in my view, is a flawed policy).

Today is Independence Day, and while for some it means flag waving and parades and burgers and fireworks, I prefer to recognize the patriotism inherent in our work in cannabis politics. Consider these words, which should sound familiar to Americans:

…all men are created equal, that they are endowed… with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness…. Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it

Cannabis prohibition is destructive to liberty and happiness, that’s for sure. And we’re all working hard to alter or abolish it.

Cannabis activists are by their very nature an eclectic, iconoclastic bunch of “outlaws”, with a passion for action and a healthy distrust of authority. We’re “independent-minded”, to be sure. So we’re going to come at this battle from different angles. We’ll all have an opinion about the perfect strategy.

What unites us is a fundamental principle:  that the government is lying about  this plant, and it’s wrong to put people in jail for it.

What flows from that principle is a policy proposal: end cannabis prohibition, and create a legal system for all responsible adults to have safe access if they want to.

In the West, the public will support such a proposal if it’s framed well.

As for me — I wrote a few months back about the reasons for medical marijuana patients to support policies expanding legal access to all responsible adults, and I sincerely hope that patients will take those words to heart. After all, legalization will be the best thing for patients.

I welcome your thoughtful critique.

 

Montana’s New Medical Cannabis Law — For Now

July 1st, 2011 by John Masterson 16 comments »

Recently we posted a bullet-list summary of the implications of SB 423, if it were to become law. The MTCIA lawsuit succeeded in blocking some of the most onerous portions of the law yesterday. Here is what remains (new info in bold):

Patients

  • Your existing card is still valid until it expires (unless you are on probation, in which case your card may offer no protection. The judge suggested that courts decide whether probations should be eligible on a case-by-case basis); eligible patients will be able renew under the new rules.
  • The same medical conditions will continue to qualify you, but if your diagnosis is “severe chronic pain”, the new law is much more strict. The pain must be persistent and of severe intensity, and objectively proven by an X-ray or MRI, or a second physician must confirm the diagnosis after a physical exam.
  • You must be a Montana resident.
  • Once you have your card, if you do not choose a provider, you’ll be able to possess 12 seedlings, 4 mature flowering plants, and 1 ounce of usable marijuana. By choosing a provider, you give up your right to grow for yourself.
  • Failure to notify the state of a change of address within 10 days voids your card.
  • You must carry your medical marijuana card with you at all times.
  • Parents wishing to register their minor children need a second doctor’s recommendation, must submit fingerprints for an FBI background check, and agree that the minor will never smoke marijuana, only use infused products.
  • People under department of corrections supervision are not eligible.
  • Gardens may not be combined and shared, unless you are relatives by blood or marriage.
  • Drivers may be compelled via search warrant to provide a blood sample.  5ng/ml is cause for a DUI charge.
  • If your drivers license is revoked for DUI, your medical marijuana card must be surrendered.
  • Your out of state recommendation offers no protection.

Caregivers

  • Anyone who wishes to grow marijuana for someone else will be subject to a fingerprint background check by the FBI (as of October 1st), as well as a financial background check (unpaid taxes, student loans, child support).
  • If you do not get one of the new cards in June, you must bring in all your plants and product to local law enforcement for destruction before July 1st.
  • You may choose to register as a “marijuana-infused products manufacturer” instead of, or in addition to, registering as a “provider” (grower).
  • If approved, providers will be allowed to grow 4 mature plants and 12 seedlings each for up to 3 unlimited patients.
  • Nobody can sell anything to anyone. No money, nothing of value may be exchanged for marijuana, except that the patient may reimburse the provider for the state application fee.
  • Infused product manufacturers must use separate cookware from that which they prepare “normal” food, and are subject to local health department food preparation rules.
  • You must carry your provider card with you at all times.
  • Law enforcement will be automatically notified of the location of your garden. You may have only one. Law enforcement can conduct unannounced inspections during business hours.
  • Gardens cannot be combined or shared.
  • Must keep a complete set of records showing all transactions with cardholders (by name and ID number), open for inspection by law enforcement at any time during business hours.
  • Advertising of any kind is prohibited, including via electronic media (websites, email). This provision is effective upon passage — mid-May.

Doctors

  • Must describe in writing the medical condition, why it is debilitating, and the extent to which it is debilitating.
  • Must confirm that they have assumed primary responsibility for caring for the patient.
  • Must describe the range of other medications and treatments used to treat the condition.
  • Must confirm that they have reviewed all other medications and supplements and considered their possible interaction with marijuana.
  • Must confirm they have explained the potential risks of marijuana.
  • May not affiliate in any way with providers or infused products manufacturers.
  • May not examine patients where marijuana is being grown.
  • May not offer a discount or incentive to a patient for choosing a particular provider.
  • Will be reported to the Board of Medical Examiners if they recommend for more than 25 patients in a year. This will trigger a formal review of the physician’s practices, for which the physician will be responsible for the costs.
  • Telemedicine recommendations will constitute “unprofessional conduct” under 37-1-316.

Next step? The referendum to block all of SB 423 until it can be voted on by the people in 2012.