Hashish May Not Be Medical Marijuana in Montana

February 18th, 2010 by John Masterson Leave a reply »

It is common to hear patients, caregivers, and public officials decry the “gray areas” in Montana’s medical marijuana law. Hashish is one of those, and I recently spoke with a criminal defense attorney who has concluded that any amount of hashish may be prosecuted as a criminal offense, even if you have a state-issued medical marijuana card.

First though, a word about so-called gray areas. Here’s another way to think about it:

There is one way to interpret any aspect of the law on which everyone will agree — patients, growers, lawyers, and every cop and judge in Montana.  This is the most strict, narrow interpretation of the law, and one you can rely on. For example, the fact that a registered patient may possess up to one ounce of marijuana buds. Nobody doubts that the law currently protects this conduct.

Then there are the parts of the law where various people differ on appropriate interpretation. Caregivers may insist that one reading is reasonable and correct, while patient advocates may describe the same interpretation as “risky”. Even two lawyers may disagree.

When the meaning of the law is not crystal clear to absolutely everyone (with no debate), then what we are likely to see is cases with identical facts treated differently in different jurisdictions. And no matter how confident you may be of our interpretation of the law, if a cop, prosecutor, and judge in Broadwater County feel differently, you could go to jail. For years.

Hashish is one of the topics on which there is not universal agreement. Let’s review the law.

The Montana Medical Marijuana Act states:

“Usable marijuana” means the dried leaves and flowers of marijuana and any mixture or preparation of marijuana.

“Any preparation”  seems like it should include hashish, and the helpful DPHHS FAQ agrees.

A qualifying patient and a qualifying patient’s caregiver may each possess up to six marijuana plants and up to one ounce of usable marijuana. “Usable marijuana” means the dried leaves and flowers of marijuana and any mixture or preparation of marijuana. This would include hashish, tinctures or food products. (emphasis added)

However, Montana criminal code states:

A person convicted of criminal possession of marijuana or its derivatives in an amount the aggregate weight of which does not exceed 60 grams of marijuana or 1 gram of hashish is, for the first offense, guilty of a misdemeanor… (emphasis added)

And elsewhere:

“Hashish”, as distinguished from marijuana, means the mechanically processed or extracted plant material that contains tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and is composed of resin from the cannabis plant. (emphasis added)

So the criminal code specifically distinguishes between marijuana and hashish, allowing up to 60 grams of buds, but only one gram of hash. More than either threshold constitutes a felony punishable by up to 20 years in prison.

The next piece of the puzzle is a principle of law which basically states:

If two laws seem to conflict, but one makes a specific statement and the other is more general, then the law with greater specificity takes precedence.

So, the medical marijuana law implies that hashish (as “any preparation”) is the same as marijuana, but the criminal code specifically distinguishes between the two.

Therefore, one way to interpret Montana law is that medical marijuana cardholders possessing any amount of hash are committing a criminal offense.

I’m not a lawyer, and there may never be a prosecution of this nature. But we hear that some growers are selling up to an ounce of hash to their patients, so it’s best everyone be aware of the risks of doing so.

Remember, no matter how certain someone  may be of a particular interpretation of the law, it may take some jail time and thousands of dollars in legal fees to successfully argue the case. Be careful out there.

15 comments

  1. You our putting out false statements again!!!
    The law says ANY PART OF THE PLANT!
    You really should get a real attorney!
    Whomever is advising you is an idiot!!!
    Quit scare try to scare everyone!!!

  2. grassroots medical says:

    In Dillon, if you have 4 DUI’s you go to prison, but if your well “liked”, and get 5 DUI’s, you still get to drive. The system will go after who they want, and ignore the ones that they like.

  3. john says:

    Mike, I tried to make it clear in this post that there is no one “correct” interpretation of the law, not yours, and not the Missoula County Attorney’s.

    I’m not saying that “hash is illegal”, I’m saying that it’s possible to interpret the law in this way and therefore there’s a non-zero risk to patients who rely on a different interpretation.

    You may have concluded that various activities are defensible and may win in court, but how things actually play out depends on the cop’s and judge’s and prosecutor’s demeanor as well. It can be painful and expensive to test these things in court, even if you end up winning.

  4. Hey Healing Center – John was only stating the obvious. Get a Cop, D.A., or Judge that has a serious attitude problem about medical marijuana, and its red headed step child (Hash) and things could go very wrong.

    Forewarned is good!

  5. READ THE LAW
    ANY PART OF THE PLANT!!!!!!!!!!
    ARE YOU JUST STONED????

  6. PeacePeak says:

    I had a friend just get busted for having 1 gram of hash even though she is a MMP patient here in Montana. They told her hash is 100% illegal…

  7. Dominic Hyde says:

    Healing center is right any part of the plant is leagle our elected officals are forgetting who they work for and going against the citizens and that is tyrany stand up montana all card holders must not let them prosecute hash its time to protest ” If people let goverment decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take there bodys will soon be in as sorry as state as the souls of those who live under tyrany” Thomas jeeferson

  8. Chris K says:

    Thank you healing center, as Montanan’s we need to exercise our patient rights and stand against the unjust. That begins with stopping those creating a false consensus fueled by the uneducated

  9. There are now multiple prosecutions underway for hash. We’ll see how they play out.

  10. N8 says:

    The Healing Center rep on here, (Mike) appears to not have read the entire article. I have to be honest, John wrote a well thought out article that presents a clear statement: if you have hash in Montana, there is no guarantee that you are legal. Mike’s aggressive tone and combative “are you stoned” comment does nothing to promote our cause. Mike I suggest that you keep selling Hash at your location, we need some Designated Convicts to step up to the plate to “hash” out this issue, and it appears you know more than the rest of us who try to have an open conversation, so it looks like your a good candidate. Where is your store located?

  11. Grow Guide says:

    thats crazy hash is pure marijuana

  12. deidre becker says:

    hmmm. hash is the crystals on top on the flower? the resins the female creates during flower? the sticky substance that she exudes in hopes of entrapping some unwary male pollen so she can procreate?

    its her… sex hormone, if you will, and it isn’t part of her? hmmmm. I hear what the law doesn’t say, i guess i would like to hear what science says…..

  13. deidre becker says:

    or am i just high? thats not hash, thats thc. pure, crystal sticky medicinal thc. hmmm.

    Meditating, and looking for the botany 101 book….

    not sure how you can call a substance a plant, not part of the plant, but hey, ok, i don’t want to be a test subject… a potato isn’t a potato, dudes, gals, its a pOtatO.

  14. deidre becker says:

    being all in favor of education… I read alittle. funny not alot of biological info on the plant. thc is produced in the tricomes, which are present on the female flowers and to some degree the leaves as well as the leaves and flowers of the male plant.

    not alot of real information why they are there, best hypothesis is temperature control…

    so the question would be … is a substance part of a plant if it is separated from the plant? even if that substance can only be created by that plant?

    frankly, i am far more interested in why the plant makes it in the first place.

    hmmmm

Leave a Reply